Medtrics was created to be flexible and to change with the needs of the medical education community.
Edgar Poe | Director Michigan State University

Generic RFPs fall short in medical education, often missing the nuances of curriculum mapping, LCME compliance, and real stakeholder workflows. This guide helps medical schools spot inefficiencies, define success, and structure RFPs that drive meaningful platform comparisons—before they invite a single vendor.

Nearly every GME office juggles inconsistent evaluation data, delayed IRIS reports, and patchwork tech. This guide helps institutional leaders surface workflow breakdowns, clarify platform goals, and unify diverse stakeholder needs—before writing a single RFP question. It’s built to help your team define success, reduce risk, and run a smarter procurement process.

Too many osteopathic programs scramble to gather documentation, verify credentials, or prove curriculum comparability—right before a COCA site visit. This guide helps your team identify weak spots, clarify how your current systems measure up, and align stakeholders before making a platform decision.

Timely feedback fuels better clinical education. This guide offers a practical blueprint for increasing evaluation completion in UME and GME. It draws on proven tactics—like click-light form design, automated workflows, and real-time nudging—to help programs reach 90–100% compliance. You’ll also see how institutions use Medtrics not just for tech, but for its evaluation-focused service model: mobile-first design, workflow automation, and transparent performance tracking.

Don’t just buy software—choose a partner. This guide makes the case for a service-first approach when selecting medical education platforms. It outlines how institutions use Medtrics not only for its features but for its end-to-end service model: tailored onboarding, rapid-response support, and proactive strategic reviews. The result? Smoother implementations, higher adoption, and software that evolves in step with your curriculum, accreditation needs, and institutional goals.

Transform your AVMA COE accreditation process from a fragmented burden into a streamlined, data-driven advantage. This guide shows how veterinary colleges use Medtrics to centralize documentation, automate compliance, and stay audit-ready year-round.

Medical education leaders are under pressure to modernize without risking compliance or student experience. This guide offers 25 essential questions that help MD programs evaluate what’s working, what’s not, and what a platform truly needs to support LCME alignment, MSPE efficiency, and competency-based education. You’ll see how Medtrics supports streamlined workflows, integrated evaluations, and real-time curriculum tracking across the full learner lifecycle.

62% of GME teams still rely on spreadsheets, shared folders, and fragmented systems to manage duty hours, evaluations, and IRIS. This guide helps your team spot inefficiencies, define what success looks like, and align internally—before you ever evaluate a platform. Use it to avoid re-creating the same problems in a new system.